Hacktivism Events
http://www.altogetherdigital.com/20080210/anonymous-vs-scientology-stran...
There were lots of events all aronund the globe. I hope you can all make it to one come March 15th. But what I'm mostly interested in is whether the international media is reporting on this at all, because I know that not a word of it has been broadcast through the BBC over here. And it's the BBC's legal duty to do shit like that, which is suspicious. Is this deemed un-newsworthy? It was a turnout of only 500. What do you people think?
I didnt watch the news, but whilst looking online it seemd that there were a few newspapers that covered the story here in the states, none of it page 1, none of it above the fold. I cant speak for the tv news outlets.
The few articles i read all included the picture of the lone Scientologist with a sign saying how he doesnt hate anyone and is willing to talk about his religion, who i think was either in Florida or LA, i am not sure. The news media does not seem to be taking Anonymous or their mission seriously, which is interesting since the media is more than willing to make fun of Scientologists. As soon as a group becomes proactive against what they deem an cult of organized crime, while, the news media demoizes them instead.
From those that do not know the full digs, here is Anonymous's original manifesto:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCbKv9yiLiQ
And here is a response they also posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrkchXCzY70
And here is one of their newest responses:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SQKbHBqDwSI
Thast last one I am not sure if it is actual produced by Anonymous. I saw a different version of that same manifesto, without any music in the background, and a slightly different voice reading the manifesto, but that one has been removed from YouTube. This one is the exact same text, just a different production. Here is a copy of the text:
Ladies and gentlemen of the public and the press,
Today, working in concert with concerned citizens from all over the world, Anonymous has staged a large number of simultaneous public demonstrations at Church of Scientology centers around the globe. Now that we have made evident the sincerity of our intentions and the strength of our dedication, we would like to take this opportunity to clarify our objectives to the press and to the public. There have been a number of myths and misconceptions surrounding the nature of our means and intentions. Among these is the idea that our declaration of war is to be interpreted as a threat of physical harm against individuals affiliated with the Church of Scientology.
Allegations that Anonymous wishes to physically harm any human being as a part of our campaign against the cult of Scientology are patently untrue. As stated in one of our productions, the intention of Anonymous is to 'systematically dismantle the Church of Scientology in its present form'. Our struggle is directed against the toxic ideals and behavior of the corrupt, violent, and abusive leadership of the Church of Scientology, not against the lives of those who have become entangled with it. Know this: though we oppose all that they stand for, even the highest officers of this cult will not be harmed physically by Anonymous. Our battle is one of ideas. As we speak, it is being fought and won in the hearts and minds of the worlds honest citizenry and their leaders. The ideological nature of our struggle brings us to another common misconception regarding the objectives of Anonymous in this campaign.
Although many of us are put off by L. Ron Hubbard's religious doctrine, we do not oppose the right of individuals to follow beliefs of their choice. As set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, "everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion". Anonymous, as a whole, honors the spirit of this declaration. We fight against the atrocities - not the beliefs - of the brainwashing cult known as the Church of Scientology. The acts of defamation, intimidation and murder perpetrated by this criminal organization galvanize our resolve to fight against it. Our righteous indignation is directed against the hypocrisy of this institution, not against the faith of its members. As an illustrative example of our stance, we would like to draw your attention toward a group of individuals who practice L. Ron Hubbard's teachings, but have disaffiliated themselves from the Church of Scientology. They are known as the Freezone. Anonymous bears no animosity toward an organization such as this one.
Many of you may wonder how Anonymous plans on launching into the task of dissolving the Church of Scientology. As a fundamentalist, totalitarian organization that seeks control of information and manipulation through fear, the Church of Scientology possesses inherent flaws. Anonymous is studying these flaws, and has made them the basis of a long-term strategy.
Our first major objective is the revocation of this cult's tax-exempt status wherever it has managed to obtain one. Indeed, the privileges awarded to the Church of Scientology under US law are significantly more generous than those enjoyed by major religions. As set out by the appellants in Sklar v. Commissioner, training offered through the Church of Scientology is tax deductible, while that obtained through legitimate religious institutions is not. The status of the Church of Scientology as a tax exempt religion is an affront to honest religious organizations. However, its special status with the US IRS which places it above and beyond other religions is not merely an affront, but a slap in the face.
Other objectives set out by Anonymous at the present time include - but are not limited to - exposing the criminal practices of the Church to public scrutiny, neutralization of its fraudulently obtained assets and corresponding operations, the liberation of members coerced and blackmailed to work for the Church in illegitimate ways, declaration of the Church and its shell corporations as prohibited criminal organizations and the criminal prosecution of the persons responsible for particularly heinous acts performed in the name of this Church.
Throughout our struggle, we maintain the following thesis: that the Church of Scientology was founded for purposes incompatible with a society holding dear a respect for human rights and the rule of law. These nefarious purposes can only be achieved through criminal enterprise, and remain objectives of the Church to this day. We further maintain that this criminal enterprise is operated by its leaders knowingly and willingly, and that the true extent and tone of the Church's activity is outrageous and sickening. These statements are not contrived, but based on conclusions derived from extensive study of Church history. Our sources include its own documents, the testimonies of its victims, the words of those who have escaped it and educational materials that the Church would keep secret for fear of exposure. We therefore consider the Church of Scientology a despicable criminal organization which, through the indoctrination of its members, predation upon those in need, the dissemination of lies regarding its nature, by way of sadistic retaliatory practices against its critics and through its cynical abuse of civil liberties has forfeit any right it had to exist.
On several occasions, figures within the media have casually dismissed Anonymous as nothing more than a gaggle of restless youth. We remain entirely undeterred by their remarks. Virtually all age groups, creeds and professions are represented within our ranks. Many who are not affiliated with Anonymous have expressed support for our campaign. Their words serve to further underscore the broad demographic base of our initiative. If you remain doubtful of our strength and resolve, we invite you to observe them for yourselves.
Actions speak louder than words. In the name of those who have been silenced by the criminal organization that is the Church of Scientology, Anonymous will be heard. Our cause is just. We shall prevail.
We are Anonymous.
We have Awoken.
We stand as One.
Here is a response from NBC:
http://www.nbc11.com/news/15191161/detail.html
This is an article BEFORE the recent protests, though, not actually covering them but anticipating them. Like others, it continues to have overtones of criticism towards Scientology, but still does not take Anonymous seriously, and refers to them as "Hackers," which is an untruth. There are hackers involved, and the first wave of their campaign was an online attack and their original manifesto includes a systematic removal of Scientology from the Internet, so it is understood that they be misconstrued as hackers, but as their most recent message to the press states, hackers are only part of their community, which is made up of virtually all age groups, creeds and professions.
Here is a Gothamist, which is part of the NYTimes, article which covers the protest and is somewhat more favorable, though not entirely, and links to other articles from LA, London, Austin and Seattle
http://gothamist.com/2008/02/11/nyc_scientology.php
Also, in response to BBC - BBC has had some of their own shit going down with Scientology. They were producing a (are producing?) a documentary about Scientology, and there are videos of a BBC reporter screaming his arse off at some Scientology folks arguing with him
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxqR5NPhtLI
and then there are videos of Scientology folks getting pissed with him and while not yelling physically threatening him and then walking away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HGM8DSnYh0
Supposedly the BBC has some of their own articles/comments on the situation, such as this, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6650545.stm but I havent actually read that whole thing or other BBC responses. But I dont wonder if, especially if in the process of making a documentary, they are treading lightly until they get all the footage and info they need...
March 15th is Hubbard's birthday. All Sea Org (CoS) staff members are required to turn out for the event. It's a pretty big holiday for them.
Here's my thread that's (sorta) about the coverage we got in the Tampa-Clearwater area.
http://chuckpalahniuk.net/forum/1000026/i-can-has-media-coverage
I know also that the protest in Clearwater was the leading news story that night on our FOX affliate, and the second story on ABC. It's kind of a big deal around here.
There was also an article in Newsweek recently, which I consider a huge coup: http://www.newsweek.com/id/109410
In English, when we say: "It is raining"
What the fuck is IT? Sometimes I wake up in a cold sweat afraid that IT has found me.






Joined: 2006-05-25
From: